16th Finance Commission Devolution

Syllabus: Issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure, devolution of powers and finances up to local levels and challenges therein.

Context and Key Recommendations

  • Sixteenth Finance Commission recommended retaining States’ share in divisible tax pool at 41%.
  • States demanded an increase to 50% citing constrained fiscal space under GST regime.
  • Commission acknowledged growing mismatch between State expenditure responsibilities and assured revenue streams.
  • States increasingly rely on market borrowings as primary fiscal adjustment mechanism.

Vertical Devolution Assessment

  • FC-16 retained status quo on vertical devolution for the 2026–2031 period.
  • Suggested approach prioritised stability over expanded discretionary fiscal space for States.
  • Commission flagged shrinking effective divisible pool due to cesses and surcharges.
  • No recommendation to include cesses and surcharges within the divisible pool.

Horizontal Devolution Formula Changes

  • “Tax effort” criterion restructured into “contribution to GDP” performance indicator.
  • Weight for this indicator increased sharply from 2.5% under FC-15 to 10%.
  • Intended to reward productive and efficient States through outcome-linked transfers.
  • Gains for industrialised States like Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra remain incremental.

Demographic and Population Criteria

  • Weight for demographic performance reduced to avoid penalising population growth trends.
  • Reflects India nearing peak phase of its demographic dividend.
  • Weight for population size modestly increased within horizontal devolution formula.

Transfers and Governance Implications

  • Total transfers to States budgeted to rise by 12.2% between RE 2025-26 and BE 2026-27.
  • About ₹1.2 lakh crore, nearly 42%, routed through Centrally Sponsored Schemes.
  • Reinforces model where States primarily implement priorities set by the Centre.

Structural Concerns and Limitations

  • Commission recognised financial stress in State budgets without proposing structural corrections.
  • No phased roadmap for raising States’ share to 45% or higher by 2031.
  • Recommendations reflect cautious reform rather than transformative fiscal federalism rebalancing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top