27th Constitutional Amendment of Pakistan

Syllabus: Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with that of other countries

Background and Nature of the 27th Amendment

  • Pakistan’s legislature passed the 27th Constitutional Amendment during November 12–13, last year.
  • The amendment received presidential assent, formally altering the constitutional framework.
  • Presented as military command reorganisation, it restructures constitutional adjudication authority.

Shift in Judicial Authority

  • Original jurisdiction over constitutional interpretation transferred from the Supreme Court to “Federal Constitutional Court” (FCC).
  • FCC now decides fundamental rights, federal–provincial disputes, and constitutional questions.
  • Supreme Court’s role as final constitutional guardian is significantly reduced.
  • Earlier jurisdiction enabled landmark rulings, including Panama Papers and Memogate cases.

Rule of Law and Institutional Balance

  • Amendment weakens judicial independence by fragmenting constitutional adjudication.
  • A.V. Dicey’s doctrine emphasises courts as sentinels against arbitrary executive power.
  • Courts function as bridges between authority and liberty, not mere dispute-resolution bodies.

Federal Constitutional Court Concerns

  • Specialised courts are not inherently problematic, but removal of Supreme Court primacy is destabilising.
  • The earlier 18th Amendment strengthened judicial appointments through Judicial Commission of Pakistan.
  • FCC structure risks greater executive influence over constitutional interpretation and composition.
  • Judicial review may become extension of executive preferences rather than independent oversight.

Historical and Comparative Perspective

  • Sir Edward Coke resisted King James I’s claim to personal judicial authority.
  • This episode affirmed courts must remain insulated from political or royal interference.
  • Judicial independence forms the foundation of modern constitutional democracies.

Regional and Indian Significance

  • South Asia faces institutional strain, political instability, and security-driven governance choices.
  • India, as the region’s largest constitutional democracy, has a normative stake in outcomes.
  • The PCA reflects a trend of using formal legal changes to concentrate political power.
  • Democratic erosion often occurs through gradual constitutional rewriting, not abrupt coups.

Core Democratic Lesson

  • Constitutions survive through institutional restraint, judicial autonomy, and respect for boundaries.
  • The amendment risks turning the Constitution from a shield of liberty into an instrument of control.
  • The future of republics depends on preserving the spirit, not just the text, of constitutionalism.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top