
Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation.
Background
- The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 were notified to operationalise the DPDP Act, 2023.
- They trigger the formation of the Data Protection Board of India (DPBI) and initiate India’s digital privacy framework.
- Draft Rules were released in January 2025; final Rules notified on November 14, 2025.
Core Provisions of the DPDP Act & Rules
- Data Governance Framework
- The DPDP Act sets baseline obligations for data fiduciaries handling personal data.
- Data principals (users) must be informed about data collection and its purpose.
- Users can modify, erase, or request deletion of their data.
- Firms must erase data after long-term user inactivity.
- Compliance Requirements
- Large firms classified as Significant Data Fiduciaries must implement:
- Access controls, encryption, security audits.
- Mandatory Data Protection Officer (DPO) within one year.
- Large firms classified as Significant Data Fiduciaries must implement:
- Children’s Data Protection
- Restricts targeted advertising and sensitive data collection from children.
- Rules allow a parental exemption for tracking a child’s location.
- Consent Management
- Establishes a Consent Manager system enabling users to manage permissions across platforms.
- Breach Reporting
- Data breaches must be reported promptly to the DPBI.
- Penalties
- Fines range from ₹10,000 to ₹250 crore based on violation category.
Implementation Timeline
- Majority of compliance obligations delayed by 12–18 months.
- Only DPBI formation and RTI Act amendment take effect immediately.
- DPBI Formation
- The DPBI is a subordinate office under MeitY with four members.
- Responsible for enforcement, inquiries, and penalties.
Key Issues with DPDP Rules 2025
- Delayed Implementation of Protections
- Rules postpone implementation of almost all user-protective provisions to 2027.
- This delay follows already prolonged consultations and slow framing of Rules.
- The 12–18 month compliance window for major tech companies undermines urgency.
- Immediate Dilution of RTI Act
- Nature of Change
- Section 8(1)(j) — previously allowed disclosure of “personal information” if public interest justified it.
- DPDP Act removes the public interest override, enabling authorities to deny more RTI requests.
- This sharply reduces transparency and reverses two decades of RTI-driven accountability.
- Nature of Change
- Weak Institutional Framework
- Data Protection Board of India (DPBI) remains institutionally weak and lacks independence.
- DPBI will function under MeitY, creating conflict of interest as the same Ministry promotes global tech investment while overseeing investigations into data misuse by Big Tech.
- Reduced Safeguards Against State Overreach
- The Act already provides broad exemptions for government agencies.
- Rules fail to limit these exemptions or establish robust oversight mechanisms.
- Limited Change from Draft Rules
- Final Rules show minimal changes from the January 2025 draft, despite lengthy consultation.
- This reflects poor responsiveness to stakeholder feedback.
Conclusion
- The DPDP Rules 2025 undermine privacy and weaken RTI, leaving citizens exposed to unchecked state surveillance and Big Tech data practices.
- The promise of “privacy and accountability” remains largely unfulfilled.
