Custodial Torture in India: A Crisis of Human Rights?

Syllabus: Indian Constitution — historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.

Meaning and Nature

  • Custodial torture refers to physical or mental suffering inflicted on detainees by police or other authorities.
  • It violates human dignity, often resulting in custodial deaths.
  • Physical torture includes beatings, electric shocks, suffocation, sexual violence, stress positions and denial of medical care.
  • Psychological torture involves threats, humiliation, sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and mock executions.
  • Torture is frequently used to coerce confessions under extreme pressure.

Extent in India

  • 2016–22: India reported 11,656 custodial deaths, with Tamil Nadu recording 490 and Uttar Pradesh 2,630.
  • Tamil Nadu accounted for 50% of preventive detentions in 2022 (2,129 cases).
  • SCs faced disproportionate impact, forming 38.5% of detainees despite being 20% of the population.

Constitutional and Legal Safeguards

  • Constitution
    • Article 14: Equality before law; state agencies not above law.
    • Article 21: Protects life and liberty; prohibits cruel or degrading treatment.
    • Article 20(1): No retrospective punishment.
    • Article 20(3): Protection from self-incrimination.
  • Statutory Provisions
    • BNS Section 120: Punishes violence used to extract confessions.
    • BNSS Section 35: Mandates lawful and justified arrests.
    • BSA Section 22: Rejects confessions obtained through coercion.
  • International Norms
    • UN Charter (1945): Mandates humane treatment.
    • UDHR (1948): Prohibits torture and enforced disappearances.
    • India signed but has not ratified United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) (1984).

Challenges

  • No standalone anti-torture law despite UNCAT signing.
  • Impunity: Zero convictions in 345 judicial inquiries (2017–22).
  • Weak institutions: NHRC/SHRCs lack binding authority; overcrowded prisons and inadequate police complaints mechanisms.
  • Victim fear and poor protection, especially among marginalized groups.
  • Judicial delays and poor compliance with D.K. Basu Guidelines.

Key Recommendations

  • Law Commission (273rd Report): Ratify UNCAT; enact a dedicated Prevention of Torture law.
  • Judicial rulings:
    • DK Basu (1997): Mandatory safeguards during arrest and interrogation.
    • Ram Sagar Yadav (1985): Burden of proof shifts to accused officer.
    • Nambi Narayanan (2018): Recognised severe psychological harm.
  • NHRC: Mandatory reporting within 24 hours; non-compliance implies suppression.

Way Forward

  • Enact stringent anti-torture legislation with compensation mechanisms.
  • Strengthen institutional accountability and specialised investigation units.
  • Reform policing, separate law-and-order and investigation wings, and introduce human-rights training.
  • Ensure independent oversight and judicial supervision of custody.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top