Who Decides Citizenship? EC vs Centre Power Tussle Explained

 

Syllabus: Indian Constitution — historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.

Overview

  • The Election Commission (EC) clarified that the Union government has limited authority over citizenship scrutiny.
  • The statement was issued through a 184-page affidavit in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case.
  • The clarification responds to Opposition claims that SIR is being used as citizenship screening.

Centre’s Power Under Section 9

  • Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 deals with termination of Indian citizenship.
  • The Centre’s jurisdiction covers only voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship.
  • It can determine when and how an Indian citizen acquired foreign nationality.
  • EC stressed that this is the only exclusive domain of the Union government.

EC’s Stand on Citizenship Assessment

  • The EC asserted authority to examine citizenship status for voter registration purposes.
  • Citizenship is a constitutional prerequisite under Article 326 for inclusion in electoral rolls.
  • It argued that even if citizenship appraisal is centralised, the proof sought in SIR is only for electoral roll registration, not citizenship determination.
  • EC maintained that SIR does not constitute a de novo NRC exercise.

Constitutional Basis for EC Powers

  • EC said its scrutiny powers flow from Article 324, granting plenary authority over elections.
  • Laws made under Article 327 cannot dilute the Commission’s constitutional mandate.
  • ROPA 1950, through Sections 16 and 19, requires voters to be Indian citizens and ordinarily resident.
  • SIR, authorised under Section 21(3) of ROPA, must be “intense” and triggered by administrative necessity.

EC’s Rebuttal to Opposition Allegations

  • EC denied claims that SIR shifts the burden unfairly onto voters.
  • It called the exercise voter-friendly, requiring only signatures on pre-filled forms delivered by booth-level officers.
  • It upheld SIR as vital for maintaining the purity of electoral rolls, a key aspect of free and fair elections, considered a Basic Feature of the Constitution.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top