Hindu Rate of Growth: Economic Stagnation vs. Narrative Battle

Syllabus: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and employment.

Meaning and Origin

  • The Hindu rate of growth refers to India’s persistently low GDP growth (≈3.5–4%) from the 1950s to the 1980s.
  • It indicates long-run real GDP stagnation, not religion-linked behaviour or cultural explanations.
  • Coined by economist Raj Krishna (Delhi School of Economics) in the late 1970s to describe India’s structural growth trap prior to reforms.

Core Characteristics of the Hindu Rate of Growth

  • Prolonged Low GDP Growth
    • Indian GDP remained around 3.5–4% annually for three decades.
    • Per capita income grew slower due to high population growth, showing deep economic inertia.
  • Stability Despite Shocks
    • Growth remained largely unchanged despite wars, droughts, famines, and political transitions.
    • Economists saw this as a system-wide equilibrium reflecting policy rigidities.
  • Licence–Permit–Quota Raj
    • Excessive industrial licensing, import controls, and price regulation suppressed productivity.
    • High tariffs and strict import substitution policies limited competition and efficiency.
    • A large public sector dominance reduced private innovation and investment.
  • Mixed Economy with State-Led Controls
    • The state controlled core industries, credit allocation, trade, and foreign investment.
    • Limited market participation and minimal foreign capital restricted growth acceleration.

Comparative and Historical Context

  • East Asian Contrast
      • While India grew at ~3.5%, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore achieved 7–10%, highlighting India’s relative underperformance.
  • Growth Turnaround Before 1991
    • Growth accelerated to ≈5.6–5.8% in the 1980s, even before liberalisation.
    • This reflected gradual deregulation, reduced licensing, and partial internal reforms.

Contemporary Context

  • The Prime Minister criticised the phrase as colonial, communalising, and misleading, arguing it unfairly associates Hindu culture with economic stagnation.
  • The debate highlights how terminology frames economic narratives and influences public perception of India’s development journey.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top