Right to a Healthy Environment

Syllabus: Indian Constitution — historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.

Context: Air Pollution and Public Health

  • Winter smog in Delhi–NCR severely degrades air quality, causing recurring public health emergencies.
  • Measures like work-from-home and hybrid schooling offer limited relief against persistent pollution exposure.
  • Major pollution sources include fossil fuel combustion, transport, industry, waste management, construction, and agriculture.
  • Particulate Matter (PM) is the most lethal pollutant, responsible for widespread cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

Severity of Particulate Matter Pollution

  • PM10 particles enter the respiratory system, adversely affecting human health.
  • PM2.5, finer particles below 2.5 microns, penetrate deeper into lungs and bloodstream.
  • Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM), mostly below 1 micron, poses severe risks, including to children.
  • CAQM amended Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), mandating school closures under Phases 3 and 4.
  • States must now stagger office timings during Phase 3, enhancing preventive public health measures.

Constitutional Foundations of Environmental Rights

  • Original Constitution lacked explicit environmental provisions, but principles existed implicitly.
  • Supreme Court interpreted Article 21 to include environmental protection in Maneka Gandhi (1978).
  • Articles 48A and 51A(g) introduced state and citizen duties for environmental protection.
  • In Subhash Kumar (1991), clean air and water were recognised as essential to meaningful life.
  • Judiciary used Public Interest Litigations under Articles 32 and 226 to balance development and ecology.

Environment as a Welfare State Obligation

  • Environment Protection Act, 1986 defines environment as air, water, land, and their interrelationship.
  • Right to pollution-free surroundings is intrinsic to human dignity under Article 21.
  • Recognised explicitly in Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra (1985) and M.C. Mehta (1987).

Environmental Principles in Disaster Jurisprudence

  • Absolute liability applied in hazardous industrial disasters like the Oleum Gas Leak case.
  • Precautionary principle mandates preventive action despite scientific uncertainty.
  • Polluter pays principle holds polluters financially responsible for environmental damage.
  • Both principles affirmed in Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum (1996).

Public Trust Doctrine and Climate Change

  • State acts as trustee of natural resources for public benefit, not private gain.
  • Doctrine reinforced in M.C. Mehta vs Kamal Nath and Radhey Shyam Sahu.
  • In M.K. Ranjitsinh (2024), right against adverse climate impacts recognised under Articles 21 and 14.

Conclusion

  • Judicial interpretation alone is insufficient for effective environmental protection.
  • Explicit constitutional recognition of the right to a clean and healthy environment is urgently required.
  • Such inclusion would ensure shared responsibility of the state and citizens in environmental governance.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top