MGNREGA Replaced by VB-G RAM G Act, 2025

Syllabus: Inclusive growth and issues arising from it.

Context and Constitutional Background

  • The Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 replaced MGNREGA.
  • The Act received Presidential assent, formally ending the earlier rural job guarantee framework.
  • Article 21 guarantees the right to life, including the right to livelihood, as affirmed by the Supreme Court.
  • The Olga Tellis (1985) judgment linked livelihood directly with the constitutional right to life.

MGNREGA: Rights-Based Framework

  • MGNREGA recognised right to work on demand as a legal and enforceable entitlement.
  • Guaranteed unemployment allowance if work was not provided within 15 days.
  • Mandated timely wage payments, compensation for delays, minimum wages, and gender parity.
  • Strengthened Panchayati Raj Institutions, supporting decentralised governance under the 73rd Amendment.
  • Emphasised creation of durable ecological and livelihood-supporting assets.

Documented Positive Outcomes of MGNREGA

  • Universal entitlement ensured inclusion without targeting-based exclusions.
  • Rural incomes increased, contributing to poverty reduction and school enrolment growth.
  • Women’s participation averaged around 58%, enhancing gender equity.
  • Dependence on moneylenders declined significantly, improving household financial security.
  • Initially criticised, MGNREGA was later acknowledged globally as a successful rural development model.
  • Played a crucial role in livelihood protection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Erosion of MGNREGA in the Last Decade

  • Persistent underfunding caused chronic wage delays and rationing of work.
  • Technocratic measures increased exclusions, administrative opacity, and corruption risks.
  • Inadequate staffing weakened oversight and undermined social audits.

Key Changes under VB-G RAM G Act, 2025

  • Union government gains discretionary authority over location, nature, and funding of works.
  • Funding shifts from demand-driven to normative, centrally controlled allocations.
  • Centre’s responsibility for wage delay compensation has been removed.
  • Funding ratio altered to 60:40, increasing fiscal burden on States.
  • States must bear expenditure beyond allocations, risking political favouritism.

Labour and Equity Concerns

  • Employment restricted for 60 agricultural days, harming landless workers and women.
  • Claim of 125 days employment contradicts existing funding realities.
  • Likely outcomes include suppressed work demand, unemployment, and distress migration.
  • No new safeguards introduced to prevent corruption or strengthen accountability.

Conclusion

  • MGNREGA embodied Gandhian decentralisation and Ambedkarite rights-based empowerment.
  • The new Act institutionalises earlier erosion, weakening rural livelihoods and constitutional guarantees.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top