U.S. Unilateralism and Violation of International Law

Syllabus: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests

Background of the Venezuela Action

  • U.S. President Donald Trump announced military action against Venezuela from Mar-a-Lago.
  • He declared Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores would be captured and tried in New York.
  • The U.S. claimed the action targeted “narco-terrorism” but made oil access explicit.
  • Venezuela is a modest cocaine source, while 69% U.S. overdose deaths involve fentanyl.
  • Precursor chemicals originate largely in China, weakening the narcotics justification.
  • Venezuela holds the largest proven oil reserves globally, revealing economic motivations.

Violation of International Law

  • The action violated Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, banning force against State sovereignty.
  • Use of force is permitted only with UN Security Council approval or self-defence under Article 51.
  • The U.S. intervention lacked both authorisation and legal justification under international law.

Breakdown of Balance of Power

  • The incident reflects erosion of the balance of power principle in international relations.
  • During the Cold War, U.S. and Soviet rivalry restrained unilateral military actions.
  • Bipolarity ensured mutual deterrence, preventing unchecked use of force.

Historical Illustrations of Balancing

  • In 1971 Bangladesh War, Soviet naval deployment neutralised U.S. Seventh Fleet pressure on India.
  • During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Soviet troop mobilisation forced Israeli restraint.
  • The U.S. responded with DEFCON-3, preventing annihilation of the Egyptian Third Army.

Post-1991 Unipolarity

  • The collapse of the Soviet Union removed the principal counterweight to U.S. power.
  • The U.S. adopted a doctrine of pre-emptive war and regime change.
  • Governments in Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria were overthrown through direct or indirect intervention.

Emerging Counter-Balances

  • China is the only credible emerging counter-balance to U.S. dominance.
  • A Russia–China axis could challenge unipolarity, though internal differences persist.

Implications for India

  • The U.S. has shown insensitivity to India’s security interests.
  • India must strengthen its military-industrial base and pursue innovative defence strategies.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top