Federalism in Delimitation: Demographic Challenges & UPSC

Context and Constitutional Framework

  • Article 81 mandates that representation in Parliament should be based on population proportionality across States.
  • The 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 froze the number of Lok Sabha seats until the first Census after 2026.
  • The freeze aimed to incentivise States to pursue population stabilisation policies.
  • With the upcoming Census (2026) and delimitation before the 2029 Lok Sabha elections, the issue has regained urgency.

Changing Demographic Realities

  • In 2005–06, only nine States had achieved replacement-level fertility (TFR 2.1 or below).
  • By 2021, most major States had achieved this level, except Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, and Manipur.
  • Significant disparity persists:
    • States below national average TFR: 1.64
    • States above national average TFR: 2.38
    • This reflects nearly 45% higher fertility in lagging States.
  • These differences indicate uneven progress in population stabilisation efforts across States.

Core Issue: Population vs Federal Fairness

  • Strict population-based delimitation may reduce representation of States that successfully controlled population growth.
  • This creates a paradox where States that performed better in governance may face political disadvantage.
  • The issue is not limited to North–South divide; several States such as Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Goa also achieved early demographic transition.
  • There is a need to balance democratic equality (one person, one vote) with federal fairness (equitable representation of States).

Proposed Approach: Demographic Performance (DemPer) Principle

  • Inspired by the Finance Commission model, which incorporates demographic performance in resource allocation.
  • Key features of DemPer approach:
    • Population remains the dominant factor for seat allocation.
    • Demographic performance is incorporated for additional seats beyond existing 543.
  • Suggested weightage:
    • 10% weight to early achievement of replacement fertility (before 2005).
    • 90% weight to the rate of decline in fertility between 2005–2021.
  • Expected outcomes:
    • All States gain seats, with more populous States gaining more in absolute terms.
    • States with better demographic performance do not lose relative representation.
    • Promotes a model of fair federalism.

Broader Concerns and Limits

  • Excessive increase in Lok Sabha size may affect quality of deliberation.
  • Given population growth, expansion is necessary, but the total strength should ideally remain below 700 members.
  • Delimitation must avoid becoming a politically sensitive regional conflict issue.

Way Forward

  • Adopt a balanced formula combining population and demographic performance.
  • Ensure that delimitation strengthens both representative democracy and federal stability.
  • Recognise States as meaningful political units, not merely demographic aggregates.
  • Promote a framework that rewards good governance and population stabilisation efforts.
  • Conduct delimitation with transparency to minimise regional tensions and mistrust.

Conclusion

  • Delimitation is not merely a technical exercise but a test of India’s commitment to cooperative federalism. A balanced approach that integrates population with performance will ensure that democracy remains both representative and fair, thereby strengthening the unity of the Union.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top