Plastic pollution management in India

Geneva talks (2025): ~180 countries failed to agree on a legally binding treaty on plastic pollution.

Divisions over:

  • Scope – waste vs. production.
  • Funding – developed vs. developing countries.
  • Health impacts – include in treaty or leave to WHO.
  • Draft treaty rejected despite UNEP resolution.

Definition

  • Plastics: Synthetic polymers derived mainly from fossil fuels, moulded into diverse products.
  • Characteristics: Cheap, versatile, non-biodegradable, persistent in environment for centuries.

Threats from Plastics

  • Plastics = fossil-fuel derived synthetic polymers.
  • Persistence: Non-biodegradable, remain for centuries.
  • Ubiquity: Cheap, versatile → widespread use in packaging, healthcare, aviation, electronics.
  • Pollution: Prime source of litter, marine waste, and microplastics.

Chemicals in Plastics

  • Monomers & additives: Ethylene, propylene, styrene, bisphenols, phthalates, PFAS, PCBs, PBDEs.
  • Applications: Bottles, food containers, toys, IV bags, cosmetics, paints, electronics.
  • Scale: 16,000+ chemicals; 10,000+ poorly studied; 4,000+ identified as “chemicals of concern.”

Health Impacts

  • Endocrine disruption: Bisphenols, phthalates → thyroid dysfunction, fertility issues.
  • Cancers: Styrene, PCBs → kidney, testicular cancer.
  • Metabolic disorders: PFAS → hypertension, diabetes, obesity.
  • Neurological impact: PBDEs → cognitive and developmental issues.
  • Microplastics: Detected in blood, placenta, breast milk, bone marrow; linked to inflammation and metabolic stress.

Challenges

  • Economic: Dependence on cheap, versatile plastic.
  • Scientific: Limited toxicity data for the majority of chemicals.
  • Governance: North–South divide on scope, funding, and responsibility.
  • Implementation: Weak recycling and waste management systems.

India’s Position

Domestic actions:

  • Ban on single-use plastics in ~20 States.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework for collection/recycling.

Limitations: Treats plastics mainly as a waste management issue, not health.

International stance: Opposed inclusion of health impacts in treaty; suggested WHO as appropriate forum.

Way Forward:

  • Global binding treaty covering production, use and waste.
  • Funding & technology transfer for developing nations.
  • Promote circular economy and biodegradable alternatives.
  • Invest in long-term health studies on plastic exposure.
  • Strengthen domestic regulations and public awareness.

Conclusion 

Plastic pollution is both an environmental and a public health crisis. The Geneva stalemate highlights difficulty of reconciling economic dependence with sustainability and health protection.

GS Paper III – Environment, Ecology & Health

  • Plastic pollution as a triple planetary crisis issue (climate, biodiversity, pollution).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top