AI-Generated Content Labelling

Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors

Context

  • AI-Generated Deepfakes: Synthetically created images and videos proliferating on social media through generative AI technology.
  • Easy Creation: Photorealistic content is now generated simply by typing scene descriptions using AI tools.
  • Rapid Development: Technology evolved significantly throughout 2024, raising concerns about electoral integrity and disinformation.
  • AI Slop Pervasiveness: Spread from low-budget advertisements to high-budget political caricatures across digital platforms.

Government Intervention

  • India’s User Base: The World’s second-largest AI user base faces an unclear problem scale regarding AI content identification.
  • Mandatory Labelling: The Union government proposed compulsory AI-generated content labelling through the IT Rules, 2021 amendment.
  • Global Conversation: Initiative advances international discourse on navigating the synthetic media phenomenon effectively.

Justification for Action

  • Virality Risk: Like pre-AI misinformation, misleading content can explode into virality gaining disproportionate democratic influence.
  • Technology Improvement: Photorealistic content creation technology is improving weekly, deceiving more people increasingly.
  • Celebrity Complaints: Public personalities frequently complain, sometimes legally, about unauthorised likeness usurpation for unscrupulous projects.

Industry Response

  • Voluntary Initiatives: Large social media and AI firms offered labelling of synthetic content’s accessibility.
  • Meta’s Decision: Facebook decided to label AI-generated content last year for user transparency.
  • Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) Coalition: Brings industry players together addressing “digital provenance” issues borrowing art appraisal concepts.

Regulatory Concerns

  • Legislative Instrument: Subordinate legislation may not be ideal; IT Rules already regulate streaming, removals, gaming without parliamentary testing.
  • Parliamentary Review: Rules need explicit consideration by people’s representatives ensuring democratic accountability.
  • Innovation Lag: Technology policymakers acknowledge that regulation typically lags behind innovation throughout the Internet era.

Way Forward

  • Dynamic Follow-up: Government must aggressively pursue proposal with agile action adapting to technological changes.
  • Regulatory Flexibility: Relax outdated rules and introduce new ones according to emerging requirements and challenges.
error: ******** !!
Scroll to Top