Union Budget 2026–27 : Tax Revenue Risks and Demand-Side Concerns

Context and Reference to Budget 2025–26

  • Budget 2026–27 assessed against outcomes of the previous middle-class tax cut strategy.
  • Government expected higher compliance and rising incomes to offset reduced tax rates.
  • The anticipated revenue buoyancy did not materialise as initially projected.

Tax Revenue Performance and Shortfalls

  • Income tax collections fell short of estimates by ₹1.26 lakh crore in Revised Estimates.
  • Goods and Services Tax collections showed a further shortfall of ₹1.31 lakh crore.
  • Corporate tax and excise duty performance marginally reduced the overall gross tax gap.
  • Total gross tax revenue shortfall remained around ₹1.92 lakh crore.

Impact on Expenditure and Development Priorities

  • Fiscal deficit rules link expenditure levels directly to realised tax collections.
  • Revenue shortfalls triggered across-the-board expenditure reductions.
  • Capital expenditure, agriculture, education, health, and urban development faced budgetary cuts.
  • Reduced spending affected employment generation, income support, and essential public services.

External Risks and Macroeconomic Uncertainty

  • India faces current account surplus with the United States and deficit with China.
  • Potential export decline from U.S. tariff escalation could worsen external balance.
  • Economic Survey assigned 10% probability to external sector deterioration.
  • Budget planning assumed continuity of stable global conditions.

Demand-Side Strategy and Employment Concerns

  • Budget emphasises fiscal prudence, supply-side measures, and MSME credit guarantees.
  • Employment outcomes, especially among youth and urban women, remain weak.
  • Corporate investment growth continues to be subdued despite repeated policy approaches.
  • Public capital expenditure prioritised infrastructure over development-oriented spending.

Policy Gaps and Missed Opportunities

  • Employment-intensive sectors like education, health, and agriculture received limited emphasis.
  • Welfare and development spending noted for strong multi-round demand generation potential.
  • Environmental concerns, particularly urban pollution, received no specific budgetary focus.
  • Absence of a demand-led strategy raises questions on long-term employment sustainability.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top