Union Budget 2026-27: Shifting Welfare Responsibilities

Overall Orientation of Social Sector Budget

  • Budget 2026–27 introduces no new flagship social welfare schemes, marking a notable departure.
  • Welfare agenda increasingly shaped through legislation and national norms, not direct central spending.
  • Social sector continues to receive low priority in both allocations and actual expenditure trends.

Allocation Trends for Vulnerable Groups

  • Key schemes include NSAP, SAMARTHYA, PALNA, PM POSHAN, and Saksham Anganwadi.
  • Nominal allocation increases range from 0.2% for NSAP to 5.2% for Saksham Anganwadi.
  • Revised Estimates for 2025–26 remain below Budget Estimates, indicating persistent underspending.
  • Welfare coverage for children, pregnant women, elderly, single women, and persons with disabilities remains constrained.

Health and Education Spending Patterns

  • Health allocations rise by 6.4%, while education allocations increase by 8.3% in Budget Estimates.
  • Revised Estimates for both sectors fall 3.7% and 5.2% below initial allocations.
  • Budget growth figures thus mask actual contraction in real spending capacity.

Declining Expenditure in Major Social Heads

  • Largest Revised Estimate declines observed in Urban Development, Rural Development, and Social Welfare.
  • Jal Jeevan Mission spending fell from ₹67,000 crore BE to ₹17,000 crore RE.
  • PMAY-Grameen and PMAY-Urban saw significant downward revisions despite repeated headline allocations.
  • Centrally Sponsored Schemes display systematic underspending across most welfare sectors.

Shift of Welfare Responsibility to States

  • Post-2015 reforms increased State cost-sharing obligations under Centrally Sponsored Schemes.
  • VB-G RAM G allocation of ₹96,000 crore requires additional ₹56,000 crore from States.
  • True welfare spending now depends on State budgetary capacity and fiscal prioritisation.

Federal Fiscal Constraints and Concerns

  • States receive only 34% of total tax revenues, below the 41% Finance Commission recommendation.
  • Higher reliance on cesses and surcharges reduces divisible tax pool for States.
  • Finance Commission grants declined from ₹1,32,767 crore to ₹1,29,397 crore.
  • Growing welfare burden raises concerns over State fiscal space and service delivery outcomes.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top