Governor’s Address to Legislature

Syllabus: Issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure

Context

  • Tamil Nadu and Kerala Governors deviated from customary Assembly addresses on January 20.
  • Their actions revived debates on the constitutional role and conventions governing Governors.

Constitutional Framework

  • Article 176 mandates the Governor to address the Legislative Assembly annually.
  • The address outlines the policies and agenda of the elected State government.
  • The Governor functions on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
  • The practice reflects the Westminster parliamentary tradition adopted in India.

Recent Instances of Deviation

  • The Tamil Nadu Governor refused to read the prepared speech and walked out.
  • His office cited “misleading and unsubstantiated claims” as justification.
  • Over three years, he has digressed or declined to read Cabinet-approved texts.
  • The Kerala Governor allegedly skipped approved portions and added unvetted content.

Convention and Democratic Norms

  • The address is a time-honoured convention, not an expression of personal opinion.
  • Former President R. Venkataraman described Governors as “mouthpieces” of elected governments.
  • The British monarch’s practice of strictly reading official texts serves as a reference.
  • Deviation is viewed as undermining parliamentary propriety and federal balance.

Call for Constitutional Review

  • Tamil Nadu Chief Minister suggested amending the Constitution to remove the practice.
  • Articles 87 and 176 require special addresses by the President and Governors annually.
  • President Venkataraman earlier called the practice a “British anachronism” and formality.
  • He urged repeal during the tenures of Prime Ministers Rajiv Gandhi and Chandra Shekhar.

Alternative Provisions

  • Even without Articles 87 and 176, leaders retain rights under Articles 86 and 175.
  • These provisions allow the President and Governors to address legislatures when necessary.

Governance Implications

  • Governors should avoid assuming powers beyond constitutional intent.
  • Respecting conventions strengthens institutional credibility and democratic trust.
  • Adherence upholds the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top