Health Care Does Not Need the PPP Route

Syllabus: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources.

Policy Context and Objectives

  • Public policies reflect objectives through design, not stated intentions or symbolic development claims.
  • PPP in medical education may prioritise profits, optics, or rent-seeking, not public welfare.
  • Framework design indicates dilution of affordable, quality public medical education goals.

Expansion of Medical Colleges in Andhra Pradesh

  • Government medical colleges increased to 17, with 19 private colleges already operational.
  • Proposal to add 10 new colleges under PPP mode, raising total seats beyond 6,500.
  • 835 acres acquired; colleges initiated during the previous government’s tenure.
  • Estimated cost: ₹450 crore per college, totalling ₹4,500 crore.
  • Financing planned via NABARD, State funds, and central schemes.
  • Each college planned with 150 MBBS seats attached to 650-bed district hospitals.

Fee Structure and Revenue Model

  • Three-tier fee system for fiscal sustainability:
    • 50% seats at ₹15,000 annually.
    • 35% seats at ₹12 lakh annually.
    • 15% NRI seats at ₹20 lakh annually.
  • Annual fee revenue estimated at ₹11 crore per batch.
  • Cumulative recovery expected to reach ₹55 crore by fifth year.
  • Additional postgraduate seats add significantly higher revenue potential.

PPP Model Proposed by New Government

  • Entire land and district hospitals leased for 33+33 years at nominal rates.
  • Government to provide 25% viability gap funding and statutory clearances.
  • State guarantees 70% bed occupancy and insurance empanelment.
  • Investor obligations include:
    • Completing construction within two years.
    • Providing free OPD and 70% free inpatient care at Ayushman Bharat rates.
  • Government deputes engineers and provides free space for Jan Aushadhi and medico-legal work.

Risks, Inefficiencies, and Systemic Concerns

  • Unequal risk-sharing favours private investors over the State.
  • High risk of quality dilution, faculty shortages, informal fees, and service denial.
  • Judiciary remains the only remedy if contracts fail, causing long delays.
  • Handing over district hospitals for 66 years undermines public control.
  • Evidence shows 30% hospitalisations avoidable through strong primary care.
  • PPP fragments healthcare delivery, weakening referral systems and continuity of care.

Broader Structural Issues

  • Chronic underfunding and vacancies, especially specialists in rural areas.
  • Commercialisation discourages graduates from serving in public and rural health systems.
  • State lacks institutional capacity to regulate privatised healthcare effectively.
  • Previous fragmented contracts in primary care caused enforcement failures.
  • Priority should be quality, faculty availability, and equitable access, not unchecked expansion.
  • PPP as a welfare delivery mechanism fails to inspire confidence in public health.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top