Regional Concentration of India’s Exports

Syllabus: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and employment.

Context and Core Argument

  • Aggregate export growth masks deep regional concentration and structural divergence across Indian States.
  • Export expansion no longer guarantees labour absorption or regional convergence.
  • Exports increasingly reflect pre-existing industrial capacity, not a development pathway.

Geographical Concentration of Exports

  • Five States — Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh — contribute nearly 70% of national exports.
  • Their share rose from ~65% five years ago, indicating rising concentration.
  • Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for export geography is increasing, signalling dangerous agglomeration.
  • Coastal western and southern States integrate into global supply chains, while northern and eastern regions lag.
  • A hardened core–periphery pattern is replacing regional convergence.

Changing Global Trade Environment

  • Global merchandise trade volume growth slowed to 0.5–3%, per WTO data.
  • Top 10 exporters control ~55% of world merchandise trade (UNCTAD 2023).
  • Capital now prioritises economic complexity, not low-cost labour.
  • Regions with diverse, interconnected export baskets upgrade faster.
  • Peripheral regions face entry barriers into high-value global value chains.

Capital-Intensive Export Growth

  • Traditional link between exports and mass industrial employment has weakened.
  • ASI 2022–23 shows fixed capital grew 10.6%, while employment rose only 7.4%.
  • Fixed capital per worker increased to ₹23.6 lakh, reflecting capital deepening.
  • India exports value without proportional employment, bypassing labour-intensive industrialisation.

Employment and Wage Implications

  • Manufacturing employment stagnates at 11.6–12% of total workforce (PLFS).
  • Employment elasticity of exports has collapsed, despite record export values.
  • Wage share in Net Value Added declines as gains accrue to capital owners.
  • High productivity sectors remain capital-biased, limiting mass prosperity.

Financial and Institutional Constraints

  • Credit–Deposit ratios exceed 90% in export hubs like Tamil Nadu.
  • Ratios below 50% in Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh indicate capital outflow.
  • Hinterland savings finance coastal industrial growth, deepening inequality.
  • Human capital deficits further restrict integration into complex value chains.

Implications for Development Strategy

  • Exports are now an outcome of development, not its driver.
  • Export growth is an inadequate proxy for inclusive prosperity.
  • India must reassess open-economy metrics to avoid mistaking concentration for progress.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top