Kargil, Pahalgam, and the Revamp of India’s Security Strategy

Why in News: 26th anniversary of the Kargil War (1999) coincides with recent developments in India’s security strategy.

Kargil War:

  • Background: Fought in 1999 between India and Pakistan in Kashmir; first live-televised Indian war.

Lessons from the Kargil War

1. Limited War under Nuclear Overhang: Proved that localized conflict is possible even between nuclear-armed nations with restrained escalation.

2. Intelligence Gaps: Lack of real-time intelligence and aerial surveillance delayed early detection and response.

3. Operational Shortcomings: Revealed inadequacies in equipment, logistics, and training for high-altitude combat.

4. Civil-Military Coordination: Emphasized the need for better synergy between armed forces and intelligence agencies.

Key Reforms After Kargil War

1. Security Structure Overhaul 

  • Kargil Review Committee (KRC): Headed by K. Subrahmanyam; highlighted intelligence & defence management lapses.
  • Result: Revamp of national security architecture.

2. Creation of CDS

  • Chief of Defence Staff (CDS): Single-point military advisor to govt; promotes jointness among Army, Navy, Air Force.

3. Tri-Service Commands

  • Andaman & Nicobar Command: First integrated command for future theatre command testing.

4. Intelligence Reforms

  • NTRO: Boosts technical intelligence.
  • DIA: Coordinates military intelligence.

5. Border Security Enhancements

  • Modern surveillance tech: Thermal imaging, sensors, radars.

6. Operational & Technological Reforms

  • Upgraded weaponry: e.g., Dhanush, Akash missiles.

7. Improved Coordination

  • Real-time intelligence sharing across services.
  • Joint exercises institutionalised.

8. Counter-Terrorism Strengthening

  • IB given leading role.

9. Indigenous Navigation System

  • IRNSS (NavIC): Developed after US denial of GPS during war.

10. Doctrinal Shifts

  • Cold Start Doctrine conceptualised.

India’s Long Struggle Against Terrorism

Early Challenges:

  • IC-814 hijacking (1999), Parliament attack (2001), and 26/11 (2008) lacked decisive military retaliation.
  • Highlighted strategic restraint despite public outrage.

Shift in Strategy:

  • Uri (2016): First surgical strikes across LoC.
  • Pulwama (2019): Prompted Balakot airstrikes, crossing Pakistan airspace for the first time.

Operation Sindoor (2025):

  • After Pahalgam attack killed 26 civilians, India launched deep strikes on terror camps and military bases.
  • Disabled nuclear sites; Pakistan sought ceasefire.
  • Marked a bold escalation in counter-terror doctrine.
  • Clear shift from defensive posture to decisive military retaliation.

Strategic Continuity & Assertiveness

  • Kargil taught India the importance of military readiness and institutional reform.
  • Pahalgam reflects the culmination of those reforms with assertive, coordinated action.
  • India’s security doctrine has evolved—from restraint to retaliation.

Conclusion: If Kargil was a watershed moment for India in its conventional fighting capability, Pahalgam has set the bar against any future terror attack in India.”

GS Paper 3: Internal Security & Defence

  • Evolution of India’s national security strategy post-Kargil.

GS Paper 2: International Relations

India-Pakistan relations and the role of cross-border terrorism.

Q. “The Kargil War of 1999 was a turning point in India’s national security architecture. In light of recent cross-border terror incidents and India’s military responses, critically analyses the evolution of India’s security strategy and its implications for regional stability.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top