India’s Critical Minerals Diplomacy

Syllabus: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests

Context and Rationale

  • India’s clean energy transition depends heavily on imported critical minerals and rare earths.
  • China’s export controls have increased urgency to diversify mineral supply chains.
  • India pursues a two-pronged strategy: domestic capability building and overseas access.

India’s Partnership Strategy

  • Over the last five years, India has formed multiple bilateral and multilateral mineral partnerships.
  • Objectives include diversification, responsible sourcing, and standards-based mineral markets.
  • Outcomes vary, requiring recalibration and prioritisation of engagements.

Key Bilateral and Regional Partnerships

  • Australia
    • Considered a reliable partner due to political stability and large mineral reserves.
    • India–Australia Critical Minerals Investment Partnership (2022) identified five lithium and cobalt projects.
    • Cooperation includes joint research, investments, and long-term supply planning.
  • Japan
    • Demonstrates a resilience-based institutional model after past Chinese export restrictions.
    • Cooperation expanded from Indian Rare Earths Limited to joint extraction, processing and stockpiling.
  • Africa
    • Rich mineral base combined with expectations of local value addition.
    • Agreements with Namibia and asset talks in Zambia show renewed engagement.
    • Requires a long-term industrial approach to remain competitive.
  • United States
    • Cooperation limited despite “friend-shoring” rhetoric.
    • Tariffs, trade volatility, and Inflation Reduction Act incentives hinder stability.
    • Frameworks include TRUST Initiative and Strategic Minerals Recovery Initiative.
  • European Union
    • Critical Raw Materials Act and European Battery Alliance integrate regulation with sustainability.
    • India must align with transparency, lifecycle and environmental standards.
  • West Asia
    • UAE and Saudi Arabia investing in battery materials and refining capacity.
    • Potential midstream processing partners, but institutional frameworks remain weak.
  • Russia
    • Holds significant reserves but faces sanctions, financing and logistics constraints.
    • Useful as a diversification hedge, not a primary supplier.
  • Latin America and Canada
    • Argentina, Chile, Peru, Brazil emerging as new mineral frontiers.
    • KABIL signed ₹200 crore agreement with Argentina.
    • Canada offers promise but depends on political stability.

Way Forward

  • Processing and refining are the main choke points, not ore access.
  • India must integrate upstream, midstream and downstream partnerships strategically.
  • Strengthening domestic ESG, transparency and responsible mining frameworks is essential.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top