Juvenile Justice and Age of Criminal Responsibility

Syllabus: Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes

Context

  • A Private Member’s Bill (December 2025) proposes lowering the transfer age from 16 to 14 years.
  • The proposal targets children accused of heinous offences carrying minimum seven-year imprisonment.

Juvenile Justice Framework

  • The JJ Act, 2015 introduced a “transfer system” for serious adolescent offences.
  • Children aged 16–18 years may face preliminary assessment by Juvenile Justice Boards.
  • Assessments examine mental capacity, understanding of consequences, and circumstances of offence.
  • Children’s courts can try transferred adolescents as adults or as children.

Concerns with Transfer System

  • The system lacks empirical support and contradicted parliamentary review findings.
  • No reliable tools exist to assess adult-level mental capacity retrospectively.
  • Decisions often rely on subjective indicators like remorse, fear, or awareness of wrongdoing.
  • Similar cases receive unequal outcomes due to varied JJB interpretations and procedures.

Statistical Reality of Youth Crime

  • NCRB 2023 recorded 31,365 cases involving Children in Conflict with the Law.
  • These cases formed 0.5% of total crimes registered nationwide.
  • 79% of apprehended adolescents were aged 16–18 years.
  • Only 21% belonged to the 12–16 years category, challenging deterrence claims.

Structural Vulnerability Perspective

  • Many CICLs are also children needing care and protection.
  • Contact with justice systems often reflects poverty, inequality, and unmet welfare needs.
  • Lowering the age threshold risks deepening punitive exposure rather than addressing vulnerability.

Impacts of Adult Criminal Processes

  • Detention disrupts education and hampers cognitive development.
  • Criminal trials create stigma and lasting psychological stress for adolescents.
  • Reports highlight illegal police detention and adult prison placements.

Reform-Oriented Approach

  • The Bill prioritises punishment over rehabilitation and reintegration principles.
  • Emphasis should shift toward family support, education, and mental health services.
  • Strengthening institutions ensures child protection without eroding rights-based safeguards.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top