Lessons from China on Tackling Air Pollution

Syllabus: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment.

Background and Context

  • China and India have historically faced severe urban air pollution challenges.
  • Beijing reduced annual PM2.5 levels by over 50% (2013–2021).
  • Delhi continues to rank among the world’s most polluted cities.
  • Divergent outcomes highlight differences in policy design and governance execution.

Beijing’s Clean-Air Transformation

  • Pollution reduction followed deliberate, top-down policy interventions, not incremental change.
  • Driven by Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan and Blue Sky Protection Campaign.
  • Strategy rested on coherent policy design, strict enforcement, and regional coordination.
  • Key Measures Adopted by Beijing
    • Expanded electric mobility across public and private transport systems.
    • Shut down or relocated hundreds of polluting industrial units.
    • Replaced coal-fired boilers with natural gas across urban areas.
    • Enforced stringent China VI vehicular emission standards.
    • Established dense real-time PM2.5 monitoring networks.
    • Imposed heavy financial penalties for environmental non-compliance.
    • Coordinated with Tianjin–Hebei provinces through a unified airshed strategy.
    • PM2.5 declined from 102 μg/m³ (2013) to 31 μg/m³ (2024).

India’s Policy Landscape and Limitations

  • India has a robust statutory framework for air pollution regulation.
  • Key laws include Air Act 1981 and Environment Protection Act 1986.
  • Supporting laws like Factories Act 1948 and Motor Vehicles Act 1988 influence emissions.
  • Multiple initiatives launched: NCAP, GRAP, CAQM, odd-even, construction bans.
  • Measures are reactive, activated during pollution peaks rather than sustained planning.
  • Regulatory implementation suffers from fragmentation and institutional silos.

Governance and Enforcement Gaps

  • China’s Environmental Vertical Reform ensured hierarchical accountability.
  • Uniform enforcement enabled rapid and consistent implementation.
  • Delhi faces multi-layered governance, delaying decisions and weakening accountability.
  • Pollution Control Boards in India remain understaffed and underfunded.
  • CAQM lacks authority over inter-State pollution sources, especially stubble burning.

Structural and Behavioural Challenges in Delhi

  • Limited success of industrial relocation due to infrastructure deficiencies.
  • Waste-to-energy plants failed to meet air-quality standards.
  • Pollution intensified by vehicular emissions, weak PUC checks, construction dust.
  • Public transport expansion lags behind urban growth pressures.
  • Odd-even rationing showed negligible long-term impact.
  • Behavioural change has been slow and uneven.

Key Lessons for India

  • Shift from episodic actions to mission-mode, long-term pollution governance.
  • Treat air pollution as a national public health emergency.
  • Accelerate transition to clean energy and energy-efficient standards.
  • Enforce transport reforms with credible PUC systems and vehicle scrappage.
  • Strengthen EV infrastructure and public transport capacity.
  • Develop functional industrial zones with real-time emission monitoring.
  • Adopt a regional airshed approach for Delhi–NCR, inspired by Beijing model.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top