Security Camps & the Maoist Fight

Syllabus: Linkages between development and spread of extremism.

Current Status of Maoism

  • Maoist violence has declined sharply, with incidents reducing by nearly 90% between 2010 and 2025.
  • LWE-affected districts fell from 126 (2018) to 11 (October 2025).
  • Only Bijapur, Narayanpur, and Sukma in south Bastar remain most affected.
  • Insurgency is now confined to limited pockets of Bastar division, Chhattisgarh.

Origins of Maoist Strongholds

  • Maoists entered Dandakaranya region (DKR) in the early 1980s.
  • Pressure in Andhra Pradesh pushed cadres into forested, rugged border regions.
  • DKR’s terrain spanned Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Telangana.
  • Administrative neglect and governance deficit enabled Maoist expansion.
  • Tribal marginalisation and conflicts over jal–jungle–zameen shaped the insurgency.

Security Camps as a Game Changer

  • Establishment of security camps in remote Maoist-dominated areas proved decisive.
  • Initial local resistance declined after visible benefits to communities emerged.
  • Camps expanded the security footprint, deterring Maoist movement and dominance.
  • Improved police–population ratio restricted Maoist operational freedom.
  • Faster response times placed Maoists in a defensive posture.
  • Enhanced force confidence and morale altered the conflict balance.

Impact on Local Population and Intelligence

  • Visible state presence caused a psychological setback to Maoists.
  • Locals increasingly viewed the government as the welfare provider.
  • Improved human intelligence (HUMINT) flows strengthened counter-insurgency operations.
  • Road construction and mobile towers transformed connectivity and livelihoods.

Civil Administration and Governance Expansion

  • Civil administration leveraged security camps to re-enter inaccessible areas.
  • Officials like collectors, tehsildars, and patwaris began direct outreach.
  • Maoist appeal weakened and recruitment, funding, and arms acquisition declined.
  • Many cadres and leaders have surrendered or been neutralised.

Challenges and Way Forward

  • Long-term peace requires addressing structural and rights-based issues.
  • Implementation of PESA and Forest Rights Act is essential.
  • Governance must be rebuilt from scratch in previously neglected areas.
  • A long-term task force plan till 2047, aligned with Viksit Bharat, is required.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top