Sports Governance Reforms

Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation

Background and Policy Context

  • The Prime Minister reiterated India’s intent to host the Olympic Games, 2036.
  • The announcement builds upon hosting the Commonwealth Games, 2030, and expanding domestic athlete platforms.
  • The ambition aligns with sustained investments in infrastructure and high-performance sports development.

Government Initiatives and Budgetary Support

  • Key programmes include Khelo India, TOPS, and the Fit India Movement.
  • The Union Budget 2025–26 allocated ₹3,794.30 crore to the sports sector.
  • A record ₹1,000 crore was earmarked specifically for Khelo India.
  • Over 1,000 Khelo India Centres support nearly 3,000 athletes nationwide.
  • Support includes coaching, nutrition, equipment, and medical services for grassroots talent.

Why Olympic 2036 Raises Governance Stakes

  • The International Olympic Committee emphasises ethical governance, gender equity, and financial transparency.
  • Hosting requires large public investment in infrastructure, urban development, and security systems.
  • Risks include cost overruns, crony contracts, and underutilised stadium infrastructure.

Institutional and Structural Challenges

  • Most National Sports Federations function autonomously with limited athlete representation.
  • The National Sports Development Code, 2011 faces resistance over tenure caps and transparency norms.
  • Continued politicisation of federations undermines professional decision-making and accountability.
  • Absence of athlete-to-administrator pathways weakens policy alignment with performance needs.
  • Sports ecosystem suffers from digital and data analytics deficits in performance monitoring systems.
  • Persistent regional disparities concentrate medals among resource-rich states in youth competitions.

Lessons and Ongoing Reforms

  • The Commonwealth Games, 2010 exposed governance lapses and inefficient project management.
  • The Sports Authority of India introduced National Centres of Excellence and a Digital Athlete Database System.
  • Expansion of the National Centre for Sports Science and Research strengthens evidence-based coaching.
  • The Abhinav Bindra Task Force, 2025 highlighted accountability gaps and outdated administrative training.

Way Forward and Conclusion

  • Proposed pillars include professional sports administration, governance reform, athlete mentoring, and data-driven management.
  • The Olympic vision requires institutional credibility and administrative capacity alongside financial commitment.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top