Stubble Burning Reality Check: Fire Counts vs. Burnt Area Analysis

Syllabus: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment.

Context: iForest research reveals fire counts give skewed picture of stubble burning; burnt-area measurements show only 30% decline versus government’s claimed 90% reduction in Punjab-Haryana using misleading satellite data.

More in News:

  • Environment Ministry claimed fire counts in Punjab and Haryana fell by 92% and 90% respectively since 2021, citing effectiveness of measures in both states using satellite-derived estimates.
  • iForest study using different satellite data computed ‘burnt area’ (actual land affected by fire) showing gradual 30% reduction, falling from 31,500 sq km in 2022 to 19,700 sq km in 2025 (as of November 25).
  • India’s official estimates rely on CREAMS (IARI) data built on NASA’s MODIS (Terra and Aqua satellites) and VIIRS (Suomi-NPP satellites) observing India only at fixed times 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m..
  • Polar-satellite sensors only capture active fires, unable to compute actual 24-hour fire counts; monitoring gaps lead to underestimated emissions, mischaracterized aerosol loads, and incorrect air-quality simulations across India significantly.
  • iForest used Sentinel satellite’s Multi-Spectral Instrument data calculating burnt area at 100m x 100m resolution; though passing over India once in five days with 8-15 days lag, it’s only satellite calculating burnt area accurately.
  • Meteosat 8 and 9 with SEVIRI sensors are geostationary, continuously monitoring same spot every 15 minutes; data showed most fires concentrated in evenings since 2022 — outside polar satellites’ detection time, meaning true fire numbers undercounted systematically.

Understanding Stubble Burning

  • Stubble burning is the practice of setting crop residues on fire, mainly after paddy harvest.
  • It is widely observed in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh during October–November to prepare fields for wheat within a 15–20 day window.
  • Farmers choose burning due to low-cost disposal, weed control, and pest management advantages.

Effects of Stubble Burning

  • Environmental Degradation
    • Releases harmful aerosols and gases: COâ‚‚, CHâ‚„, CO, NOâ‚“ and PM.
    • Contributes to severe air pollution and winter smog across NCR.
  • Reduced Soil Fertility
    • Heat from residue burning raises soil temperature, killing microorganisms.
    • Causes loss of essential nutrients, degrading long-term productivity.
  • Human Health Impact
    • Chronic exposure increases risk of asthma, COPD, bronchitis and lung cancer.
    • Heightens vulnerability of elderly and children during winter pollution episodes.

Key Challenges in Controlling Stubble Burning

  • Technical & Infrastructure Barriers
      • Combine harvesters leave 10–15 cm stubble requiring removal.
      • Insufficient storage zones and limited Custom Hiring Centres (CHCs).
      • Supply chain gaps for straw collection; machinery suffers high wear due to silica-rich paddy straw.
  • Regulatory & Administrative Issues
    • Ambiguity in terms like stubble burning and environmental compensation.
    • Lack of clarity on Red Entry System and exit provisions.
    • Weak coordination across Ministries and State departments.
  • Financial & Socioeconomic Constraints
    • Subsidies insufficient for widespread machinery adoption.
    • Inadequate frameworks for utilizing environmental compensation funds.
    • Low awareness of sustainable alternatives; punitive measures dominate incentives.

Government Measures

  • Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Framework
    • In-situ management: CHCs, short-duration paddy varieties, bio-decomposer use, staggered harvesting.
    • Ex-situ management: Use of straw in biomass plants, thermal power co-firing, 2G ethanol, CBG plants, packaging material etc.
  • Regulation: Prohibition of burning and environmental compensation on violators.
  • Financial Support: SMAM (Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization) assistance for machinery procurement.
  • Promotion of Alternatives: Happy Seeder, PUSA enzyme, pelletization, biofuel usage.
  • State Initiatives:
    • UP: Parali ke Badle Govansh Khaad.
    • Punjab: i-Khet app and Cooperative Machinery Tracker for CRM equipment.

Parliamentary Committee Recommendations (Way Forward)

  • Financial Measures
    • Create MSP-like price mechanism for buying stubble; revise annually.
    • Prices must reflect real residue collection costs.
  • Technical & Infrastructure Improvements
    • Real-time crop mapping and maturity forecasting.
    • Establish interim storage sites; support local aggregators.
  • Regulatory Reforms
    • Appoint a dedicated authority for farmer grievances.
    • Clear amendments for rule definitions and environmental compensation.
    • Introduce incentive-based Red Entry removal.
  • Agricultural Practices
    • Promote short-duration varieties over PUSA-44.
    • Standardize procurement and seed certification bans.
  • Policy Integration
    • A unified National Biomass Policy to integrate residues into bioenergy systems.
    • Prioritize ethanol, CBG, and biomass pellets for circular agriculture.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top