Aviation Safety Crisis in India: FDTL Norms & Regulatory Failure

Syllabus: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways etc.

Context

  • India’s aviation safety came under scrutiny after massive Indigo flight cancellations triggered by pilot fatigue and FDTL disputes.
  • Civil Aviation Ministry and DGCA actions raised concerns about dilution of Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL), compromising safety.

Regulatory Decisions Weakening Safety

  • The Ministry suspended DGCA’s new FDTL orders to stabilise operations, prioritising commercial interests over safety.
  • DGCA appealed to pilots to resume duties, subtly signalling relaxation of fatigue-control norms.
  • Experts argue these actions undermine crew rest safeguards and make India appear unserious about aviation safety.

History of Dilution of Fatigue Norms

  • DGCA issued strong fatigue guidelines in 2007, but airlines opposed them.
  • In 2008, the Ministry kept these CAR norms “in abeyance,” favouring industry concerns.
  • Pilots challenged this in the Bombay High Court, which initially criticised the Ministry for risking passenger safety.
  • Later reversal by the Court allowed continued dilution of duty-hour norms.

Poor Preparedness and Understaffing

  • Indigo and DGCA knew new regulations were due from November 1, 2025 but failed to prepare, leading to nationwide chaos.
  • CAR (2022) mandates sufficient crew, minimum three sets per aircraft, but operational needs require at least six sets for domestic and twelve for long-haul operations.
  • Airlines allegedly under-employing pilots worsened the crisis.

Lack of Accountability

  • ICAO (2006) recommended an independent aviation regulator; India still operates with a regulator influenced by government and industry pressures.
  • DGCA overlooked compliance gaps, enabling airlines to bypass safety norms.
  • Ministry suspended safety requirements despite High Court directions, signalling regulatory capture.

Rising Safety Risks

  • India has witnessed three major air crashes since 2010 (Mangaluru, Kozhikode, Ahmedabad).
  • Findings of AI-171 (Ahmedabad) crash reportedly delayed without reason.
  • Safety environment worsening as FDTL norms remain diluted and compliance doubtful.

Key Concern

  • Government, DGCA and airlines claim safety is “paramount,” but actions on December 5, 2025 demonstrate prioritisation of economic interests over passenger and pilot safety.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top