U.S. Isolationism and Global Governance

Syllabus: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests

Background

  • The Trump administration issued a memorandumhttps://striveedgeias.in/category/prelims-pinpointer/ withdrawing the U.S. from UNFCCC and 65 organisations. These bodies were labelled as “contrary to U.S. interests” by the administration.
  • The move follows the earlier withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement during Trump’s first term.
  • The U.S. plans to end commitments on climate change, renewable energy, gender equality, and minority rights.

Impact on Global Institutions

  • U.S. withdrawal weakens UN agencies working on health, climate, and governance.
  • Earlier exit from the WHO disrupted maternal health, disease surveillance, and infectious disease control.
  • Programmes on tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV/AIDS suffered due to reduced external funding.

Geopolitical Consequences

  • U.S. retreat creates a leadership and financing vacuum in global governance.
  • This space may be filled by China and Russia, whose priorities may differ from democratic norms.
  • Reduced U.S. engagement weakens coordinated international policy frameworks.

Economic and Strategic Effects

  • Washington earlier used trade tariffs as tools for political coercion.
  • Such policies caused destabilising global economic consequences.
  • Narrow national self-interest now risks overriding global governance principles.

Societal and Ideological Risks

  • Inward-looking policies strengthen ethno-nationalism and racist hostility towards the “other”.
  • History shows such trends unleash destructive social and political forces.
  • The nation-state system may face new challenges under growing isolationism.

Overall Significance

  • U.S. isolationism undermines multilateral cooperation and global problem-solving mechanisms.
  • It threatens the stability of the international liberal order in the 21st century.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top