River Interlinking and Invasive Species: Ecological Risk of the National River-Linking Project

UPSC Mains GS Paper III & II Environment & Water Governance

River Interlinking and Invasive Species: Ecological Risk of the National River-Linking Project

An ATREE, Bengaluru study in Scientific Reports warns that the National River-Linking Project (NRLP) could spread invasive alien species between river basins — the Lower Ganga Basin, with 13–15 invasive species, may spread them to the Mahanadi Basin, which has 69 threatened species
LOWER GANGA INVASIVES
13–15 species
MAHANADI THREATENED SPECIES
69 species
INDIA’S INVASIVE SPECIES
350–400 at various stages
📰

Why in News & Context

Why in News?

  • An ATREE, Bengaluru study in Scientific Reports warns that the National River-Linking Project (NRLP) could spread invasive alien species between river basins.
  • The Lower Ganga Basin, with 13–15 invasive species, may spread them to the Mahanadi Basin, which has 69 threatened species.
  • Northeast and peninsular basins are more vulnerable than Central and North Indian basins.

Context

  • Invasive alien species are non-native species that spread in a new habitat and harm native biodiversity, ecosystems or the economy.
  • India’s river basins are naturally isolated, so many freshwater species are endemic to one basin or a small area.
  • The NRLP, run by the Ministry of Jal Shakti through the National Water Development Agency (NWDA), proposes to move water from “surplus” to “deficit” basins.
  • As reported, it would redistribute about 174 billion cubic metres of water and generate about 34,000 MW of power.
  • The Ken-Betwa link is the first link taken up under the project.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🔬

Key Findings & Ecological Risks

  • Linking rivers can remove the natural barriers that keep species and pathogens apart.
  • Biodiversity hotspots can turn into “invasion hotspots” by accumulating more invasive species.
  • The study considered only 15 freshwater invasive species with available data. Across India, about 350 to 400 species are at different stages of invasion.
  • Aquatic pathogens can also spread, and fish in one basin may have no immunity to the pathogens of another.
  • Reduced downstream flow and sediment can harm downstream and endemic species.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🧭

Multi-Dimensional Implications

  • Environment: Mixing of basin biota can cause biotic homogenisation, and dams and canals fragment habitats and disturb fish migration.
  • Economy: Fisheries, farmer livelihoods and the agro-economy can suffer from pathogen spread, loss of native fish and invasive weeds.
  • Governance: India has no dedicated invasive species policy, unlike Australia and Europe. “Surplus” and “deficit” labels can also hide seasonal variation in river flows.
  • International Relations: The project’s effects may extend to downstream countries on shared rivers.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🎯

Significance

  • Brings in a neglected risk: Most debate on interlinking focuses on displacement, submergence and flows. This study adds biological invasion as a separate threat, which widens the scope of impact assessment.
  • Gives a scientific basis for planning: Basin-level vulnerability mapping can help decide which links need extra safeguards, such as the Lower Ganga-Mahanadi link, described as one of the project’s most ecologically sensitive links.
  • Supports sustainable development: The findings show that water security goals have to be balanced against ecological security, which is central to SDG 6, SDG 14 and SDG 15.
  • Highlights the need for an invasive species policy: The estimate of 350-400 species at various stages of invasion shows that the issue goes well beyond river projects.
📰
Source: The Hindu
⚠️

Key Challenges

Data Gaps

Only 15 species were assessed, so the true risk may be larger.

Irreversibility

Once established, invasive species are very hard and costly to remove.

Weak Assessment Tools

Standard Environmental Impact Assessments often look at submergence, forests and displacement. They rarely assess inter-basin species transfer or pathogen spread.

Coordination Issues

Water is a State subject, while interlinking involves multiple States and the Centre, which complicates joint ecological monitoring.

📰
Source: The Hindu
🏛️

Policy & Institutional Measures

  • NRLP and the Ken-Betwa Link Project, for inter-basin water transfer.
  • Biological Diversity Act, 2002, for biodiversity conservation.
  • Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, which has provisions to regulate invasive alien species.
  • EIA framework under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
  • Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework under the CBD, which includes a target to curb invasive species.
📰
Source: The Hindu
📚

Mains Value Addition

Constitutional Provisions

  • Article 21 – Right to a healthy environment.
  • Article 48A – State’s duty to protect the environment.
  • Article 51A(g) – citizens’ duty to protect nature.
  • Water is under State List (Entry 17), while inter-State rivers come under Union List (Entry 56).

Legal Framework

  • Biological Diversity Act, 2002 – conservation of biodiversity.
  • Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 – stronger wildlife protection.
  • Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 – framework for resolving river-water disputes.

Important Data & Global Linkages

  • Important Data: Lower Ganga has 13–15 invasive species, while the Mahanadi has 69 threatened species. India has around 350–400 invasive species at different stages of invasion.
  • Global Linkages: Relevant to SDGs 6 (Clean Water), 14 (Life Below Water) and 15 (Life on Land), along with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🛤️

Way Forward

Mandatory Risk Assessment
Make invasion and pathogen risk a mandatory part of the EIA for every link.
National Policy
Frame a national invasive species policy with early detection and rapid response.
Baseline Data
Build baseline data through systematic surveys of freshwater species and pathogens.
Biosecurity & Flows
Apply biosecurity safeguards in sensitive links and protect environmental flows in donor rivers.
Evidence-Based Planning
Plan on a basin-wise and evidence-based footing, and weigh alternatives such as watershed management and groundwater recharge.
Community Role
Involve fishers and local communities in monitoring.
Conclusion: The NRLP addresses real problems of water scarcity and floods, but moving water also moves species and pathogens. Sustainable development requires planning water security and ecological security together. Evidence-based assessment, a dedicated invasive species policy and strong safeguards can protect India’s unique freshwater biodiversity.
📰
Source: The Hindu

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top