The Future of India’s Chip Industry

Context: NITI Aayog’s Frontier Tech Hub released a report titled “Future of India’s Semiconductor Industry”, highlighting steep challenges ahead. India does not have a single semiconductor fabrication unit yet, with the first expected to open in Dholera, Gujarat, by 2028.

Current Status of India’s Semiconductor Ecosystem

  • India’s local ecosystem is not ready to fully meet domestic demand for semiconductors currently.
  • Even chips used in domestic electronics assembly are largely sourced from outside the country.
  • As many semiconductor parts used in defence systems are produced outside India, this is increasing national security threats.
  • A total of ten fabrication units are in various stages of development across India currently.

India Semiconductor Mission (ISM)

  • ISM is a Rs 76,000 crore corpus almost fully earmarked to semiconductor fabs, component manufacturing incentives and design applications for academia.
  • The most ambitious projects, i.e. fabs, have received capital subsidies of upwards of 50%.
  • Other projects have received production-linked and output-linked incentives from both Union and State governments.
  • The sector requires sustained mission-mode commitment over a decade or more to yield meaningful results.

Key Challenges

  • Fab units typically require four to five years before commencing production after establishment.
  • During the gestation phase, units must invest in more than 50 specialised equipment from global players.
  • After production, yield optimisation and reliability testing take several quarters before chips actually reach the market.
  • Developing skilled talent for semiconductor fabrication is equally time-consuming and resource-intensive.
  • Geopolitical risks, including a potential disaster in Taiwan, could massively disrupt India’s electronics supply chain.

Strategic Recommendations of the Report

  • India must build sovereign design and research capabilities and R&D excellence, harnessing agentic AI for semiconductor engineering.
  • Building deep capabilities in materials sciences and silicon design will move India from services-led design to creating differentiated IP.
  • The report advocates selective depth, capital efficiency and system-level differentiation rather than replicating the full global manufacturing spectrum.
  • Packaging — among the last steps of chipmaking — is identified as a core production pillar and not merely a downstream activity.
  • Focus should shift toward mature and advanced nodes aligned with strategic relevance rather than frontier chips of 3 to 7 nanometres.

Capital Requirements and ISM 2.0

  • The report pegs the necessary capital expenditure from the state at USD 45 to 60 billion over a period of ten years.
  • Investment should focus on projects where risk is lower and bankability can assure returns to investors.
  • The ambition of ISM 2.0 largely stays out of big-ticket frontier fab projects, focusing instead on strategic and mature nodes.

Trusted Partners

  • The report identifies the USA, Japan, the European Union and South Korea as priority partners for semiconductor cooperation.
  • These partnerships will provide access to critical tools, equipment servicing and lifecycle support.
  • India must leverage its market scale, talent base and packaging capacity to attract strategic partnerships.
  • The report implies China is an adversary in chipmaking despite the recent diplomatic thaw in bilateral relations.

Conclusion: With sustained commitment and strategic clarity, India can build a competitive semiconductor ecosystem that strengthens economic resilience. Converting India’s semiconductor ambition into an enduring industrial and strategic reality requires a decade-long mission-mode approach with targeted public investment.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top