Which of the following statements are correct in respect of Lame Duck Politician?

OPSC OAS 2022 PrelimsPolityQuestion 3

Solved previous year question from the OPSC OAS/OCS 2022 Preliminary Examination (General Studies), with the official answer key and a detailed explanation.

Question

Which of the following statements are correct in respect of Lame Duck Politician?

(1) Having lost a re-election bid

(2) Choosing not to seek another term after expiration of his/her term.

(3) No term limit running for particular office again

(4) Abolition of Office after his/her official term

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Tap an option to check your answer.

Show answer & explanation

Answer & Explanation

Correct answer: (A) 1, 2 and 4

Explaination

  • A politician who has lost a re-election bid but continues to serve the remaining period of their current term is the most classic definition of a lame duck. Their political influence is greatly diminished as their successor is already known.
  • A politician who chooses not to seek another term also becomes a lame duck during the final phase of their tenure. Having announced their departure, their bargaining power and political leverage weaken considerably.
  • "No term limit running for a particular office again" actually means the politician can run again — which is the opposite of a lame duck situation. A politician who is free to seek re-election does not qualify as a lame duck, as they retain full political influence and electoral ambition.
  • When the office itself is abolished after the incumbent’s term ends, the officeholder effectively becomes a lame duck as their position is winding down permanently, reducing their authority and relevance in the political system.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top