Right to Protest in India: UPSC Mains Notes

UPSC Mains GS Paper 2 — Polity Fundamental Rights

Right to Protest in India

Why in News: A police crackdown on a Delhi protest march revives scrutiny of Section 163 BNSS and how routinely it is used to restrict peaceful assembly
Constitutional Basis
Article 19(1)(a) & 19(1)(b)
Section 144 Orders Study
Only 1.5% Targeted Unlawful Assembly
Section 163 BNSS
Max 2-Month Validity
📰

Right to Protest: Context and Background

Thousands gathered in New Delhi for the Cockroach Janta Party’s protest march to Parliament recently. Police cracked down, stopping protesters at multiple barricades before Parliament Street using force — bringing into focus the legal framework governing Section 163 of the BNSS (replacing Section 144 CrPC).
📊

A 2023 study examined around 5,400 Section 144 orders issued across Delhi between January 2021 and 2022 — and found that only 1.5% of these orders related to actually prohibited unlawful assemblies, exposing how routinely the provision is used beyond its stated purpose.

📜

Constitutional and Legal Framework: Right to Protest

Article 19(1)(a)

Protects freedom of speech and expression, the foundation of the right to protest.

Article 19(1)(b)

Protects the right to assemble peacefully and without arms.

Articles 19(2) & 19(3)

Permit the state to impose “reasonable restrictions” in the interests of sovereignty, integrity, public order, decency or morality.

Section 163, BNSS

Empowers an Executive Magistrate to issue written directions where immediate prevention or speedy remedy is necessary; orders cannot exceed two months unless legally extended.

  • Citizens are free to organise protests, but governments may regulate where and how they take place.
  • Demonstrations often require police permission and are confined to designated locations.
⚖️

Key Supreme Court Judgments on Right to Protest

1973
Himat Lal K. Shah v. Commissioner of Police
The SC held that while the state may regulate public meetings on streets, it cannot impose arbitrary exclusions effectively depriving citizens of the right to assemble. Freedom of assembly is essential to any democratic system as a forum for citizens to discuss religious, political, economic or social ideas.
2018
Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India
The Court upheld the validity of Section 144 as an emergency power but stressed it cannot become a permanent mechanism to prohibit protests, directing authorities to frame guidelines on regulating protest participants, maintaining distances from Parliament, and prescribing time limits.
2020
Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police
Arising from the Shaheen Bagh protests, the SC held that protests must be held in “identified areas” and protesters cannot block public roads causing inconvenience to others; there cannot be indefinite protest in public places.
🧩

Challenges in Balancing Protest Rights and Public Order

Cyclical Orders
Almost every Section 163 order reissued the moment its two-month limit expires
1.5% Only
Of studied orders actually targeted prohibited unlawful assemblies

Blanket Prohibitions

Authorities routinely convert permission requirements into blanket bans by refusing permission.

COVID-era Continuation

Conditions justifying original Section 144 orders during COVID-19 no longer held, but orders continued indiscriminately.

Designated Area Restrictions

Limiting protests only to designated areas may effectively nullify the right if such areas are inaccessible or inadequate.

Police Discretion

Wide police discretion in granting or refusing permission creates arbitrary and politically motivated restrictions.

The tension between public convenience (road blockage) and assembly rights remains constitutionally unresolved in many contexts.
🛠️

Way Forward: Protecting Democratic Right to Protest

Regulate Not Ban
Authorities must follow the SC’s direction to regulate protests through guidelines rather than blanket prohibition orders.
Transparent Permission Process
Establish clear, time-bound and transparent permission processes with written reasons for refusal.
Designated Areas Multiplied
Create adequate and accessible designated protest areas in all major cities to prevent road blockages.
Section 163 Reform
Amend BNSS to prevent automatic renewal of Section 163 orders without fresh judicial or magistrate review.
Judicial Oversight
Fast-track judicial review of protest permission refusals to provide timely remedy before planned events.
Police Accountability
Hold police accountable for disproportionate use of force during protests through independent review.
🔗
Source: Indian Express

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top