SIR, Form 6 and the ECI’s Credibility Crisis

UPSC Mains GS Paper II Elections & Constitutional Bodies

SIR, Form 6 and the ECI’s Credibility Crisis

The Supreme Court clarified that it had neither approved nor disapproved the changes made to Form 6 during the SIR of electoral rolls. It said it would now examine them
FORM 6 SOURCE
Registration of Electors Rules, 1960
POWER TO MAKE RULES
Section 28, RP Act, 1950
SIR NOTIFICATION
24 June 2025
📰

Why in News

  • The Supreme Court clarified that it had neither approved nor disapproved the changes made to Form 6 during the SIR of electoral rolls. It said it would now examine them.
📰
Source: The Hindu
📋

What is Form 6, and what does the law require?

  • Form 6 is the legal application for entering a name in the electoral roll.
  • Source of the form: It is in the Schedule to the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
  • What it asks: It covers identity, date of birth, place of residence, and declarations on citizenship and place of birth.
  • False information: It is punishable under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.
  • The form already has a fixed list of details, and nothing more is needed to prove eligibility.
📰
Source: The Hindu
⚖️

Why is the altered Form 6 being called illegal?

  • The objection is that the ECI added requirements that the Rules do not contain.
  • The add-on: The 24 June 2025 SIR notification attached a Declaration (Annexure D) to Form 6 or Form 8. It sorted applicants by date of birth against the Citizenship Act and asked for documents.
  • Who can make rules: Under Section 28 of the 1950 Act, only the Central Government can make rules. So the ECI cannot amend a statutory form on its own.
  • Dissent within the ECI: Election Commissioners called the changes “illegal and unauthorised”.
  • Citizenship check: The declaration asks about citizenship, but Article 326 only requires a voter to be an adult citizen aged 18 or above.
📝
Note: A form can be altered only through a proper rule-making process, not by an ECI notification.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🗂️

How has Form 7 added to the doubts?

  • Bulk deletion requests: Form 7 is being used to file many deletion applications in States such as Uttarakhand and Karnataka. Action against fake or frivolous filings has been limited.
  • Officer access: Reports from West Bengal and Goa say that a central data system stopped Electoral Registration Officers from using their statutory powers.
  • Two versions of Form 6: Form 6 with the Declaration continues where the SIR is ongoing. It is used without the Declaration where the SIR is complete.
Takeaway: Different rules in different States and a central data system weaken the powers of local officers.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🎯

Why does this matter beyond one form?

  • Right to vote: Wrongful deletion or exclusion at the enrolment stage affects the right to vote itself.
  • Trust in the ECI: Its authority under Article 324 to supervise elections depends on public trust.
  • Role of the Court: The Court has yet to decide whether the ECI can add such a declaration, so the rolls stay under a cloud.
Takeaway: The dispute is about who has the power to decide voter eligibility.
📰
Source: The Hindu
🛤️

Way Forward

Rule-Making Route
Any change to Form 6 should go through rule-making under Section 28.
Data on Form 7
The ECI should publish data on Form 7 filings and act against false objectors under the penal provisions.
ECINet Access
ECINet access for EROs and BLOs should be restored so that they can use their own judgement.
Uniform Procedure
A uniform enrolment procedure should apply across States.
Early Court Ruling
The Court should settle the legal status of the Declaration early, before the next elections.

Prelims Pointers

  • Form 6 is for inclusion of a name; Form 7 is for objecting to a name or seeking its deletion.
  • Article 324 gives the ECI superintendence of elections; Article 326 provides adult suffrage.
  • Section 21(2) of the RP Act, 1950 covers the special revision of electoral rolls.
Conclusion: The Form 6 dispute is a question of who has the authority to define voter eligibility. Restoring trust will need rule-based changes, transparent handling of deletions and an ECI that is seen as independent.
📰
Source: The Hindu

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top