Analysing India’s Budgets For Justice

Context: Union Budget 2026-27 shows no targeted funding to improve justice outcomes in India. The Rule of law remains critically undervalued despite its direct link to economic growth.

Key Data: Justice Expenditure In India

ComponentPer Capita Spending
Police₹1,500
Judiciary₹450
Prisons₹150
Legal Aid₹9
  • 11 high-GDP states spent a cumulative ₹2 lakh crore on justice in 2024-25 thus averaging 4.6% of state budgets.
  • Policing alone accounts for over 80% of all justice-related allocations across these 11 states.
  • Europe spends only 0.31% of GDP on justice (excluding police) thus indicating India’s skewed priorities.

Component-Wise Analysis

  • Police:
    • Most funds go toward salaries and administrative firefighting rather than quality improvement.
    • Less than 1.5% of police budget is allocated to training and only ~1% to forensics.
  • Judiciary:
    • Judiciary budgets account for less than 1% of total state budgets despite unprecedented caseloads.
    • India has only 15 judges per 10 lakh population against the 1987 Law Commission recommendation of 50.
    • 3,500 district courts handle seven times the cases of High Courts but receive only three times the budget.
    • Training accounts for just 1% of judiciary budgets.
    • For every judge position, 5-9 additional secretarial and clerical positions are needed but remain unfilled.
  • Prisons:
    • 11 states hold 60% of India’s prisoners with occupancy at 137% in 2023 thus above national average of 131%.
    • Prisons account for only 0.14% of state budgets; of every ₹100 spent, only ₹0.23 goes to training.
    • Prisons function with at least 30% vacancies across staff positions.
  • Legal Aid:
    • Receives the least funding of all justice components.
    • Primary mechanism through which low-income and marginalised individuals access justice remains severely underfunded.
    • Results in limited reach, inadequate representation and delays for the most vulnerable citizens.

Systemic Concerns

  • Current architecture is structured primarily around enforcement and surveillance, not access, adjudication or rehabilitation.
  • State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) receive a mere 80 paisa per capita despite clear statutory mandate.
  • Several SHRCs operate with over 40% vacancies, struggling to perform even basic oversight functions.
  • NCRB Crime in India 2024, 26 lakh people arrested, majority from socially and economically marginalised communities.
  • System is highly efficient at generating arrests and detentions but inefficient at supplying remedies.
  • A justice system is only as strong as its weakest component — currently legal aid and training are the weakest links.

Way Forward

  • Recalibrate justice budgets to align with constitutional mandates and evidence-based priorities.
  • Urgently increase judge strength toward the Law Commission’s recommended 50 judges per 10 lakh population.
  • Significantly enhance allocations for legal aid to ensure access to justice for marginalised communities.
  • Increase training budgets across police, judiciary and prisons from the current negligible levels.
  • Strengthen and adequately fund SHRCs to perform meaningful independent oversight functions.
  • Shift justice architecture from enforcement-centric to access and rehabilitation-centric model.

Conclusion

  • India’s justice budget reflects a system efficient at generating cases but not delivering remedies. A people-centred, constitutionally grounded recalibration of justice spending is urgently needed. Without adequate investment in all pillars of justice, rule of law and economic growth will both remain compromised.

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top