Value Of Water: The Economics of Clean Water & Odisha’s Case Study

Syllabus: Distribution of key natural resources

Context and Importance

  • Water is essential and has no substitute, yet safe access remains limited globally.
  • Only 30% of people in low-income countries access potable water, with rural access at 14%.
  • India faces similar challenges, with many communities struggling to obtain safe drinking water.
  • Existing research often measures valuation indirectly through technologies, hedonic pricing, or piped-water adoption.
  • The study offers a direct approach to measure household valuation of potable water.

Study Design in Odisha

  • Odisha ranks poorly in water access, with 83% households lacking piped connections in 2021.
  • A 2023 survey found 41% villages still lacking safe drinking water.
  • Researchers implemented a randomised controlled trial across 160 villages, with successful coverage in 99 villages.
  • Clean water was home-delivered, removing burdens of taste, collection time and transport.
  • Households were randomly assigned across three experimental arms to measure valuation precisely.

Experimental Arms

  • Price Arm: Households purchased clean water at subsidised rates, revealing willingness to pay and price sensitivity.
  • Free-Water Arm: Zero-price water established unconstrained demand, independent of affordability limits.
  • Exchangeable Entitlement Arm: Households chose between water and equal-value cash, revealing willingness to accept compensation to forgo water.

Key Findings

  • Both WTP and WTA were substantially higher than earlier indirect estimates.
  • High WTA signalled strong reluctance to surrender guaranteed clean water.
  • Demand declined moderately with rising prices, reflecting water’s status as a necessity.
  • Many households preferred water over equivalent cash, showing high intrinsic valuation.
  • Access to delivered water reduced reliance on unsafe sources and lowered collection burdens.
  • Households reported improved physical well-being, indicating immediate perceived benefits.

Interpretation and Policy Implications

  • Households value clean water highly when non-monetary burdens are removed.
  • Low uptake of chlorine or filters reflects aversion to effort, taste and uncertainty, not low valuation.
  • Policy options include decentralised delivery, targeted subsidies, and entitlement-based support.
  • The study reframes access as ensuring clean, reliable and dignified water, not merely technology adoption.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This will close in 0 seconds

Scroll to Top